This file is also available in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). 
by
Bruce C. Allen and Clyde Freeman Herreid
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
This case is complex, important, and timely. It can be used in a variety of courses such as biology, geology, chemistry, physics, meteorology, economics, political science, and ethics.
The way the case plays out will depend upon which course is involved, the resources and reading provided, and the classroom time devoted to it. We have used it twice, once in a general biology class of 20 students working in cooperative learning teams of five members with one instructor. On a second occasion it was used in a faculty development workshop with 200 people. There, 16 faculty facilitators trained in problem-based learning ran 70-minute sessions with a dozen faculty in each team. This was preceded and followed by 30 minutes of introduction and closure. The faculty ranged the entire spectrum of academic disciplines. Below is a partial list of objectives they identified for the case.
After completing this case, students should have an increased understanding of the following:
There are many issues embedded in the case, but perhaps the most important to examine early on is what people mean when they use the phrase “global warming”. Below are additional big questions raised by the case, for which we have sketched responses in the answer key.
Answers to the questions posed in the case study are provided in a separate answer key to the case. Those answers are password-protected. To access the answers for this case, go to the key. You will be prompted for a username and password. If you have not yet registered with us, you can see whether you are eligible for an account by reviewing our password policy and then apply online or write to answerkey@sciencecases.org.
If this case is run as a general discussion, students should prepare by researching answers to the study questions that appear at the end of the case. Alternately, graphs and tables can be given to the student as appendices to the case (see below).
The case is best considered by teams of students working in the problem-based learning tradition over several days. Although the case is not written in three parts, students can consider the case in distinct steps. For instance, first, they might deal with the evidence and causes of global warming. Second, they might deal with its possible consequences. Third, they might consider whether we can do anything about it. At each step they must decide what they need to find out in order to answer the questions, then do the research. A way of closing the topic is to have a wrap-up discussion where the students are asked, “Would you sign the petition to stop the United States from signing the treaty?”
Revised: 09/06/02 nas
This file is also available in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF).
Originally published at http://www.sciencecases.org/petition/petition_notes.asp
Copyright © 1999–2009 by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science. Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work.
