by
Richard Cowlishaw, Biology Department, Southwestern College, Winfield, KS
Charles Hunter, Biology Department, Southwestern College, Winfield, KS
Jason Coy, History Department, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC
Michael Tessmer, Chemistry Department, Southwestern College, Winfield, KS
In this simulation, you will represent one of several countries attempting to barter an international agreement to lower global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. For simplicity, there will only be three countries that need to lower their CO2 emissions (Countries A, B, and C). To add a bit of realism, there will be one developing nation (Country D) that is exempt from any reduction agreement.
The goal of each country is to maximize its “score” as computed below. At the end of the simulation, each member of the highest-scoring country will have their names thrown into a hat for a $50 campus bookstore gift certificate.
At the beginning of the simulation, Countries A, B, and C all have 200 points ($100 + 100 CO2 units). However, at the end of the simulation if the CO2 units of A, B, or C are below 100, their economies suffer. If the CO2 emissions are below 100, the economy must go down by one-half the amount below 100 units. For example, if Country A ends up with 80 CO2 units and $100, their economy will end up at $90. Their total score will then be 170.
The final score will be three times the economic size in dollars. Your starting economy size is $20, for a starting score of 60. No credit will be given for unsold CO2 units.
Date Posted: 11/28/06 nas
Image Credit: Title block image derived from licensed photos ©iStockphoto/Scott Anderson and ©iStockphoto/Luca di Filippo.
Originally published at http://www.sciencecases.org/kyoto_protocol/kyoto_protocol.asp
Copyright © 1999–2009 by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science. Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work.