Corn taco

The Case of the “Tainted” Taco Shells
Advanced Biochemistry Edition

by
Ann Taylor
Department of Chemistry
Wabash College


Part II—Project Design

To understand the science behind the use of genetically modified foods, Chris, Michelle, and Mark ask our class to help them. Since there is a lot of material to understand, we will divide into three “interest groups”:

Each student in the class will be assigned to an interest group. Each group will read several primary literature papers to understand how transgenic plants are made and the biochemical issues of interest to their constituents and then hand in written answers to the common questions and their group questions.

Each group will also prepare a 15-minute oral presentation to be given in lab. In the oral presentation, you should integrate your written answers into a broader discussion of when or whether genetically modified plants should be used. Your written work will be due at the time of your oral presentation. Following the presentation, there will be an opportunity for questions from the other groups.

Your grade will be 50% for the group written work, 40% for the group presentation, and 10% for your participation in the discussions of the other interest groups.

Common Questions (All groups answer these in their written answers)

Read:

Then answer the following questions:

  1. Figure 1 in the article shows a pair of scissors cutting out a gene of interest. What kind of enzyme do the scissors represent? What techniques might you use to confirm that the gene of interest has been inserted into the plasmid (the circular piece of DNA)?
  2. Besides the gene of interest, what other DNA sequences must be inserted into the plant to make it express a protein of interest?
  3. Describe the three most common genetic modifications of plants and why each modification has been made.
  4. Compare and contrast the general ELISA and PCR methods for detecting genetically modified foods. Which method is most commonly used, and why?
  5. Design 18 bp PCR primers to amplify (and detect!) the following portion of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter:
    gtagtgggattgtgcgtcatcccttacgtcagtgg(110 bases)tcaacgatggcctttcctttatcgcaatgatggcatttgtaggagc

Interest Group Questions (Only answer the questions for your group)

Entomologists

Read:

Then answer the following questions:

  1. What effect did exposure to Bt corn pollen have upon larval survival, leaf consumption, and larval weight?
  2. An insect is called an instar when it is between two molts. A newly-hatched insect is called a first-instar or larva. An adult is a final instar. Most caterpillars (butterfly and moth larva) have five or six instars. (To see the different instar stages, go to http://www.gpnc.org/monarch.htm.) Does pollen from Bt corn affect all instars equally?
  3. For Bt corn to be toxic to butterflies, what conditions must be true besides the toxicity of the Cry proteins?
  4. In one paragraph, describe the biochemical interactions that occur when an insect ingests Bt crystal proteins.
  5. Describe the three domains of a Cry protein and their putative functions.
  6. Next, we will investigate the structure of domain I in greater detail. The PDB code for one of the Cry proteins, Cry1Aa, is 1CIY. Open it using Protein Explorer (http://www.proteinexplorer.org; enter 1ciy in the box in the middle column and press “go”).

Arginines appear to play a key role in the function of domain I. Let’s examine some of these arginine residues more closely.

Farmers

Read:

Then answer the following questions:

  1. What factors have encouraged farmers to use genetically modified plants?
  2. Under what conditions do farmers reap an economic benefit from using GM crops?
  3. The enzyme affected by Roundup (glyphosate) is 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, or EPSPS for short. Find the major pathway that utilizes this enzyme. Why is this pathway crucial for plants but not for animals?
  4. The crystal structure of EPSPS has been determined with and without one of the substrates, and has PDB codes of 1G6T and 1EPS, respectively. Use Protein Comparator to look at these structures (http://www.proteinexplorer.org; page down twice to boxes to input the two PDB codes, then click “Protein Comparator.” Toggle off the spinning and waters for both the top and bottom screens, and examine the structures). Does EPSPS follow the “lock and key” or “induced fit” model of enzyme-substrate binding? Explain.
  5. Below is the structure of glyphosate. Draw the structures of the reactants and products for the reaction EPSPS catalyzes. Which substrate has a similar structure to glyphosate? Show the structural parallels between the two structures. Why did this lead to the assumption that glyphosate is a competitive inhibitor?

    Structure

  6. Based on the kinetic data presented in the Biochemistry paper, what type of inhibitor is glyphosate for the reverse reaction? Explain your answer.
  7. Describe in detail how the sequence of the resistant goosegrass EPSPS enzyme differs from the wildtype (normal) goosegrass EPSPS enzyme.

Immunologists

Read:

Then answer the following questions:

  1. What methods are used to predict whether a protein may be an allergen? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of these models?
  2. Describe in detail the conditions used to test the digestibility of proteins and how digestion was evaluated. What criteria should be used in “establishing a globally used standardized assay condition”? Based on the results of this study, what should those criteria be?
  3. Computational methods may also help screen for potential allergens. Describe the possible algorithms that could be used for such a screening. What are the advantages and disadvantages of a long and a short reference frame? What would be the advantage of discontinuous epitope searches, and why aren’t they currently used?
  4. Next, you are going to test the sequence of the Cry protein that is in Starlink corn, Cry9C. You will use the computational methods described by Kleter and Peijnenburg. The sequence is shown below:
     
    MADYLQMTDE DYTDSYINPS LSISGRDAVQ TALTVVGRIL GALGVPFSGQ IVSFYQFLLN TLWPVNDTAIW EAFMRQVEEL VNQQITEFAR NQALARLQGL GDSFNVYQRS LQNWLADRND TKNLSVVRAQ FIALDLDFVN AIPLFAVNGQ QVPLLSVYAQ AVNLHLLLLK DASLFGEGWG FTQGEISTYY DRQLELTAKY TNYCETWYNT GLDRLRGTNT ESWLRYHQFR REMTLVVLDV VALFPYYDVR LYPTGSNPQL TREVYTDPIV FNPPANVGLC RRWGTNPYNT FSELENAFIR PPHLFDRLNS LTISSNRFPV SSNFMDYWSG HTLRRSYLND SAVQEDSYGL ITTTRATINP GVDGTNRIES TAVDFRSALI GIYGVNRASF VPGGLFNGTT SPANGGCRDL YDTNDELPPD ESTGSSTHRLS HVTFFSFQTNQ AGSIANAGSV PTYVWTRRDV DLNNTITPNR ITQLPLVKAS APVSGTTVLK GPGFTGGGIL RRTTNGTFGT LRVTVNSPLTQ QYRLRVRFAST GNFSIRVLRG GVSIGDVRLG STMNRGQELT YESFFTREFT TTGPFNPPFT FTQAQEILTV NAEGVSTGGE YYIDRIEIVP VNPAREAEE

a. Search for identical sequences in allergenic proteins.

b. Carry out antigenicity prediction by constructing a hydrophilicity plot with the Hopp and Woods method [A1].

Your answer to this question should include:


Originally published at http://www.sciencecases.org/gmo/gmo_adv2.asp

Copyright © 1999–2010 by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science.  Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work.