References

Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project. (2001a). Residual Votes Attributable to Technology: An Assessment of the reliability of existing voting equipment. Cambridge, MA: Caltech/MIT.
Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project. (2001b). Voting: What is, what could be. Cambridge MA: Caltech/MIT.
Cassidy, T. (2000, 11/26). Election 2000/The Democrats; Data Collected on Faultiness of Mechanism. Boston Globe, pp. A31.
Federal Election Commission. (2002). FEC releases voting systems standards. Information Management Journal, 36(4), S4(1).
Help America Vote Act. (2002).
IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 38. (2002). Draft Standard for the Evaluation of Voting Equipment ( IEEE P1583/D2.5). New York, New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Mercuri, R. (2002). A Better Ballot Box? IEEE Spectrum, October, 46-50.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
O'Hara, J. (2002). Improving Voting Systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Bulletin, 45(11), 1.
Pacenti, J. (2000, November 11). Legal challenges to ballot may hinge on what was feasible. Palm Beach Post, pp. 8A.
Seelye, K. Q. (2001). Disabled gaining on access to vote. The New York Times.
Van Natta Jr., D. (2000, November 21). Counting the vote: Palm Beach County. New York Times, pp. A22.
Van Natta Jr., D., & Canedy, D. (2000, 11/8/2000). The 2000 Elections: The Palm Beach Ballot. Florida Democrats Say Ballot's Design Hurt Gore. The New York Times, pp. A1.