In a world without sex there would be no males and females. No flowers, no insects specialized in pollinating them, no extravagant colour and form like the peacock’s tail; and much animal behaviour would not exist. —Rolf Hoekstra
All of that is true, but so what? Who needs this stuff that Hoekstra is talking about for survival?
The great German biologist August Weismann proposed an answer to the question of “Why sex?” He asserted that sex increases genetic variation. When two different individuals mate by joining their gametes together, they produce a brand new genetic mixture and this promotes evolutionary adaptation.
This idea held sway for a hundred years until a couple of authors, George Williams and Maynard Smith, said, “Hold on. There are a couple of problems with this scenario.” Sex is not always good.
On both of the above counts, it seems clearly disadvantageous for individuals to reproduce sexually! Yet sex has evolved and seems here to stay.
Many scientists have tried to puzzle their way out of this dilemma by testing some of the assumptions inherent in the argument.
Originally published at http://www.sciencecases.org/birds_and_bees/birds_and_bees2.asp
Copyright © 1999–2008 by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science. Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work.