Detail

Paired Associates Learning, the Shortfalls of Behaviorism, and the Rise of Cognitivism by Elizabeth J. Meinz

Part IV—The Difference


Young (1959, 1961) gave Group A word pairs that were created from adjacent words in the serial list. In other words, if the serial list consisted of apple, fan, hat, airplane, bunny, paper, then the pairs given in the paired associates task were apple-fan, hat-airplane, and bunny-paper.

Young gave Group B word pairs that were created from nonadjacent words in the serial list. In other words, based on the example above, the pairs were apple-airplane, hat-paper, bunny-fan.

The learning experiment you completed earlier was conducted just like Young’s study. You were either in Group A or Group B. Can you tell which group you were in?

Below is a blank graph with the axes labeled. If the behaviorists were right, that is, if stimulus-response associations were formed between the word pairs during the serial learning task, then what would the results look like? Draw a bar above Group A and Group B to indicate what the results might look like.

Blank graph

Go to Part V—“Young’s Results”


Originally published at http://www.sciencecases.org/behaviorism/behaviorism4.asp

Copyright © 1999–2012 by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science.  Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work.