Paired Associates Learning, the Shortfalls of Behaviorism, and the Rise of Cognitivism

by
Elizabeth J. Meinz
Psychology Department
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville


Part I—Two Perspectives

In the study of human learning and memory, there have been two major perspectives: behaviorism and cognitive psychology.

Behaviorism is the view that it is not necessary to refer to knowledge or any other concept such as attention, perception, memory, or “thought” to understand behavior. Behaviorists focus on observable behavior instead of unobservable mental activity. They do not speculate about the nature of thought, but seek to explain observable behavior instead through concepts such as stimulus-response connections. This is a mechanistic view of behavior and posits that you can always predict the response if you know the stimulus.

Cognitive psychology, on the other hand, seeks to understand inner mental activity and thought. Contrary to behaviorists, cognitivists devise models and theories of memory and other cognitive activities even though these processes themselves are not viewable to the naked eye. Cognitivists seek to understand the “mind” whereas behaviorists believe it is not necessary to refer to an unseen “mind” to explain behavior.

Many psychologists of differing theoretical perspectives have been interested in human learning—in how humans acquire new information. In the demonstration we will do today, you are going to get a chance to participate in a learning experiment using lists of words.

Go to Part II—“Two Tasks”

Date Posted: 12/20/04 nas

Image: Ivan Petrovich Pavlov in his classical conditioning laboratory.

This file is also available in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF).  PDF Version

Originally published at http://www.sciencecases.org/behaviorism/behaviorism.asp

Copyright © 1999–2009 by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science.  Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work.